Step 01Authority test
Before the audit evaluates ambition, it evaluates authority. Every plank is mapped to the statute, charter section, ordinance, or interlocal agreement that grants or withholds the power to act.
M1Method · Edition 2027.05
Every plank is reviewed against authority, council action, state preemption, funding, implementation barriers, and measurable delivery before it is classified.
Step 01Authority test
Before the audit evaluates ambition, it evaluates authority. Every plank is mapped to the statute, charter section, ordinance, or interlocal agreement that grants or withholds the power to act.
Step 02Council pathway
The audit identifies the votes, agenda steps, budget amendments, and ordinance pathway required before a mayoral commitment can become city action.
Step 03State preemption check
Florida preemption is reviewed before feasibility is assigned. A commitment is not marked preempted without a named statute, court ruling, or attorney-general opinion.
Step 04Funding model
Recurring obligations are tested against recurring revenue, staffing, procurement, and grant-risk assumptions instead of campaign-year toplines.
Step 05Implementation barriers
Each record names the operational barrier that would most likely block delivery: funding gap, jurisdiction, preemption, program overlap, conversion risk, or intergovernmental exposure.
Step 06Measurable delivery
Every classification is tied to a measurable public action so readers can distinguish a promise, a pathway, and an actual municipal deliverable.